In their book Marketing That Works, Leonard Lodish, et.al., cite a survey of venture capitalists that had them rate the importance of various business functions to the success of the endeavor. The marketing function ended up with a rating of 6.7 on a scale of 7 – the highest rating of any function. In-depth follow-up interviews found that venture failure rates can be reduced as much as 60% using pre-funding marketing analysis.
This finding can’t be unknown or a surprise to the VC community. A focus on technical wizardry or novelty without a rigorous examination of the marketing plans and resources of the venture-backed firm seems shortsighted. Are most VCs capable of performing this type of analysis? Once funded who performs the function of monitoring the firms’ marketing planning and tactics? Do they relinquish total control over marketing to whoever is handed the function internally or just ignore it out of the belief that a “better mousetrap” will always prevail? Should they take more of a hands-on approach? Have things changed much regarding the assessment of marketing since the dot com bust?
